data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae1c4/ae1c486c345ea666af82836b3032135af001adae" alt=""
The whole debate was sparked off by the discovery in January of last year of a potential 10th planet, temporarily named 2003 UB313, which is bigger than Pluto.
Pluto is already an unusual planet. It is made predominantly of ice, and is smaller even than the Earth's Moon.
In 1992, scientists at the University of Hawaii discovered a new collection of objects beyond Neptune called the Kuiper Belt. Some suggest Pluto should no longer be considered a planet, but a Kuiper Belt Object. One researcher has come up with a clear planetary definition he would like to see the IAU adopt. In a nutshell – is it round?
This definition could lead to a Solar System with as many as 20 planets, including Pluto, 2003 UB313, and many objects previously classified as moons or asteroids.
New categories of planet could be introduced. Mercury, Venus, the Earth and Mars would be "rocky planets". The gas-giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune would be a second category. Pluto, 2003 UB313, and any other objects passing the "roundness test", would be reclassified as a third type of planet - perhaps "icy dwarfs". Whatever the final outcome, by September there will no longer be nine planets in the Solar System. What? What about My Very Easy Method Just Shows Us Nine Planets? How are we supposed to write a rhyme to remember twenty or so planets? There’s no respect…
For more information check out the BBC News website
Pluto - NASA
so shooting stars count as planets???
ReplyDeleteWhat happens If there is a REAL PLANET out there but it is oval...
ReplyDeleteeven shooting stars are on some kind of orbit - same as the planets, so yes to the first comment - to the second comment, above a certain size the object cannot be oval in shape, they are all roughly spherical (although they do wobble in and out of shape with time, especially the gas qiants and stars like out sun)
ReplyDelete